Technical Evaluation Matrix

Use the following matrix to evaluate engines for suitability. Edit the Wiki source and fill-in the appropriate cell with notes about each.

	Unreal Engine	Godot	Minetest	UNIGINE
Voxel Engine	Very, very rich support, supports blocky and smooth. Professional version is going to be required, which costs $299 USD. Possibly more advanced than Transvoxel	Built-in, unsure what version it's using but it appears to be in active development (based on Transvoxel by Eric Lengyel)
Dev Performance	Extremely slow, feels like a Rube Goldberg machine	Superb, almost instantaneous
Component Extensibility
Help and Support
Community
Documentation
Tutorials & Examples				​Company provided tutorials
Terrain Paging				​Paid version supports unlimited size and real time terrain deformation along with high detail
Dynamic Lighting		Claims there are only a max of 8 light sources an object can receive at a time, but this might be ok after the new Godot 4.0 lightmapper, it claims to do well and bake more than that
Network Synchronisation	Built-in both Unreal Engine and Voxel Plugin has its own built-in support	Nothing Voxel-specific, but everything Godot is node-based, and Godot allows you to add networking logic at the node level, both UDP and TCP
GPU Technology Used	Most advanced, including Vulkan	OpenGL 2.1, Vulkan is coming
Materials / Texture Support
C++ Support	Built-in	Requires use of GDNative		Support for C++
Platforms (Linux, Mac, Windows)				​Windows and Linux
Cost		Free		​Games under $100K free, but does not support large worlds after that it cost $150 a month

Description

Component Extensibility

How easy is it to tweak / modify behaviour of existing components in-case we need them to do more?

Help and Support

What's the official product and technical support like? response time, cost, etc.

Community

What's the user community of the product like? forums, response-time, skill-level, enthusiasm, activity, etc.

Notable Games

• ​Dual Universe